On Saturday, the Federal Court ruled that they would hear an expedited case on the legal challenge of the granting of prorogation, citing the “critical” nature of the Trump tariff threats, and that this somehow requires the legislative branch of Parliament to be operating when in fact it does not.
The Federal Court has expedited the process of hearing the constitutional challenge regarding prorogation.
The Court recognized the inability of Parliament to potentially respond to the Trump tariffs and perform its oversight role.
Lots to write about re influence of Miller II https://t.co/kDwNplWtOQ
— Lyle Skinner (@SkinnerLyle) January 19, 2025
Part of the problem is that the UK Supreme Court did overturn a prorogation when Boris Johnson requested it in the lead-up to Brexit, which led a bunch of bad actors in this country to decide they could use that precedent to challenge its use here, never mind that prorogations function slightly different in the UK (there, it tends to be an annual affair, separating shorter legislative sessions, which is not how it has operated here in many decades). There should be no reason why that precedent should apply in Canada at all, let alone in this particular circumstance, but we are dealing with people grasping at legal straws because they want to be able to run to the courts when they lose at politics, which is a Very Bad Thing for democracy and our entire constitutional order.
"Meaningfully debate."I'm as big of a Parliament nerd as they come, and frankly, there is nothing that six hours spent reading slogan-filled prepared speeches into the record will accomplish when it comes to those potential tariffs.
— Dale Smith (@journodale.bsky.social) 2025-01-19T02:01:09.284Z
More to the point, nothing was happening in Parliament before the prorogation because of the filibuster, and everyone was threatening non-confidence when it did resume in January, so an election wouldn’t provide Parliament any ability to “meaningfully debate” the Trump tariffs then either. These arguments are specious, and I trust the judge will throw them out of court once the hearings happen, but unfortunately, these are not normal times, and we could be in for a very bad result if government lawyers can’t argue their case well enough.
Ukraine Dispatch
An overnight missile and drone strike killed six, including three in Kyiv. Russia claims to have captured two more settlements between Pokrovsk and Kurakhove. Ukrainian forces claim a pair of attacks on oil depots in Russia’s Kaluga and Tula regions.
This week alone, Ukraine's Defense Forces shot down 33 missiles, including ballistic ones, and 311 attack drones in our skies. Another 136 drones, used in daily strikes against infrastructure, failed to reach their targets.
Heartfelt gratitude to all our warriors – military… pic.twitter.com/SqcSK5RPdX
— Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) January 19, 2025
⚡️150,000 Russian soldiers killed fighting Ukraine in 2024, Syrskyi says.
Russian forces suffered their heaviest losses last year since the start of the full-scale war, with total military losses reaching 434,000 soldiers, including approximately 150,000 killed in combat during…
— The Kyiv Independent (@KyivIndependent) January 20, 2025