With much fanfare – and a moving backdrop that was dizzying to watch – Erin O’Toole rolled out his much-ballyhooed climate plan yesterday morning, and it was…underwhelming. And bizarre. Replacing climate rebates with a special “savings account” that can only be used to purchase “green” items like bicycles and high-efficiency furnaces? Yeah, that’s not an improvement, you guys. And lo, it’s not winning O’Toole any plaudits in his own party either, with caucus members telling media that they were essentially blindsided by this, and many feel it’s a betrayal, and a sign that he has no credibility because he’ll say anything to get elected. And they probably have a point.
Here is some reaction to the news, with additional threads from Nic Rivers and Jennifer Robson.
Hoo boy. The CPC fails second-year micro yet again. https://t.co/AQHME3Tc32 https://t.co/dIP1umty8t
— Stephen Gordon (@stephenfgordon) April 15, 2021
https://twitter.com/robert_hiltz/status/1382694545398317066
https://twitter.com/robert_hiltz/status/1382716424087605252
O’Toole claiming that the existing carbon price goes into a “black hole of government” of increasing deficits is 100% false.
The existing price does not go to government coffers.
Oh, and he can’t explain how his proposal is an incentive to reduce carbon. https://t.co/5XkVnLeaYh— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) April 15, 2021
https://twitter.com/robert_hiltz/status/1382722697159925764
Meanwhile, I have a beef with CBC’s coverage of the issue, because they insist on framing the existing Liberal carbon price as a tax – which it’s not because it doesn’t go into general revenue, and the Supreme Court of Canada said this – but they insisted on calling the Conservative plan a “levy,” when it’s the exact same gods damned mechanism as the existing Liberal plan that just recycles the revenues differently. You can’t call one a tax and the other a levy because that is massively misleading. It places a wholly negative frame around the Liberal plan and not the Conservative one when, again, it’s the same mechanism. “Taxes” come with particular preconceived notions around them, in particular the gem about “taxes are theft,” and so on. CBC’s editorial decision to use this framing device biases the conversation and perceptions around the programmes, which is a very big problem.
The updated CBC story still misleadingly frames the existing system, which is a levy, not a tax. pic.twitter.com/2MouyqfUaY
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) April 15, 2021
Or maybe the entire CBC editorial board skipped that day in j-school where we talked about framing devices and how they can bias coverage.
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) April 15, 2021