Green Party leader Elizabeth May decided to weigh in on the Standing Orders debate yesterday with a proposal paper of her own, considering Government House Leader Bardish Chagger’s proposal to have been an earnest trial balloon that has now blown up in her face and in need of moving on. May’s didn’t object to some of Chagger’s proposals, but came up with a few of her own, some of which are of dubious merit.

To start off with, however, May lards her paper up with a bunch of constitutional canards, such as the fact that political parties don’t appear in the constitution. If you hear the sound of my head banging on the desk, it’s because May is privileging the written Constitution Act as opposed to the unwritten constitutional conventions which are just as valid and just as important to our system of government, and are in fact foundational because that’s how our system of Responsible Government is expressed, and parties are foundational to that system. Just because they don’t appear in writing doesn’t mean they’re absent from our constitutional framework – they are fundamental to it, and May (and the scholars she cites) are simply obtuse to not recognise that fact. May then insists that the Westminster system has been distorted by parties gaining power and with presidential leaders, but rather than actually diagnosing where the problem is – the bastardized way in which we conduct leadership contests – she instead retreats to her usual hobbyhorse of the electoral system, which would not in fact solve any of the problems she identifies.

But if you make it past her civically illiterate pap, she digs into the suggestions with the most notable one being that she wants more concentrated sittings – five-and-a-half days a week for three to four weeks at a stretch, then three to four weeks back in the riding, insisting that this is also better from an emission standpoint since MPs would be travelling less. But where her logic here falls apart is saying that given this would stress families more that making it more attractive for families to relocate to Ottawa might be a consideration – but unless the families go back-and-forth on the three-to-four week rotations, being even more disruptive to children’s schools – then there is simply falls apart on the face of it. She also proposes that staffers be given compensatory time off instead of overtime, which seems far more unfair to these staffers considering that the work doesn’t stop when MPs are back in their ridings, and you’re forcing people (many of them younger) to work even more than they already do with less time off as a bit cruel.

May also proposes that a UK-style Fixed-term Parliaments Act be adopted, which officially makes her wilfully blind to the problems that it’s causing to Westminster’s operations, and the fact that it reduces the ability to hold a government to account because it requires a two-thirds vote to call an early election beyond a non-confidence vote with a simple majority. I get that she wants this to force parties to come to different coalition arrangements, but when accountability suffers, that’s a huge problem. But as with most of her suggestions for “improvement,” May is more concerned with her own partisan intransigence than she is with actual Westminster democracy, which is why I find her entire paper to be of dubious merit.

Good reads:

• The five by-elections resulted in no surprises, but of the five outgoing male MPs, four have been replaced by women, so we’re inching toward parity.
• The filibuster into changes to the Standing Orders has been delayed until Wednesday, as the House Leaders are apparently negotiating.
• Cellphone trackers have been found in downtown Ottawa, near Parliament Hill and several embassies.
• Bill Morneau is warning American businesses that a proposed border tax could hurt them more than it would Canada.
• The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear a case that will help to clarify their previous ruling on trial delays.
• Apparently Canada is deporting hundreds of people to China every year without assurances that their human rights will be respected.
• Rural Liberal MPs are nervous about upcoming changes to gun laws, considering how badly the long-gun registry cost them in those regions.
• Canada has been looking to Israel for cyber-security advice.
• Liberal MP Nicola Di Iorio has apologised in the House of Commons for his sexist remarks to Diane Watts.
• We finally have some more information on the investigation into VADM Mark Norman, and apparently, the leaks had to do with the military supply ship refit.
• The RCMP’s former chief information officer has taken a job with Chinese firm Huawei, which has been the subject of espionage accusations.
• Kevin O’Leary says he doesn’t have “contingency plans” if he doesn’t deliver a majority government should he win the leadership.
• The Conservative leadership contest, meanwhile, remains complete confusion.
• Andrew Coyne offers a suitably acid take on the Bombardier bonus situation.
• Colby Cosh has some fun with Fair Vote Canada’s turn to cynical politics in their attempts to boost the NDP in the Ottawa-Vanier by-election.

Odds and ends:

Here’s a look at some of the Wikipedia edits being made over the last year by government IP addresses.

Malala Yousafzai will (finally) receive her honorary Canadian citizenship and address Parliament on April 12^th.