The info war aspect of our trade war is heating up, both in terms of childish tantrum—see Trump’s Instagram post of the bald eagle attacking the Canada goose (neglecting that in the end of that particular exchange, which was caught on video a couple of years ago, the goose eventually prevailed and drove the eagle off), but also American officials giving their version of what happened. Jamieson Greer was on CBC to insist that everything was fine on Tuesday night when Trump and prime minister Mark Carney spoke on the phone, and then at the last minute, the Canadians had new demands, presumably coming from the premiers. But there were some interesting omissions and non-denials in that interview, both ignoring the involvement of Howard Lutnick, and shrugging off disagreements around implementing that agreement, which is a pretty important detail. When the details of implementation include expanding just what is covered by auto tariffs, that’s a big detail, for example. And Greer did not deny that the point of this is to destroy the auto industry in Canada, trying to recast the Auto Pact and previous trade agreements as Canada somehow taking advantage of the American industry, which is hardly what happened. That non-denial spoke volumes, pretty much confirmed that this is the goal. (For more, Jennifer Robson goes through his responses and annotates them here).
Meanwhile, back in Canada, Scott Moe again roared that he didn’t want any hint of export taxes on energy or potash, nor is he going to take US booze off the shelves in the province—but he will subject it to an additional 50 percent tariff, which is the most useless symbolic gesture since most people are boycotting it of their own accord. As for Danielle Smith, she held a press conference and gave a dire warning about the effect of any export taxes, that it will force Americans to import heavy oil from Venezuela and it will cause a chain reaction and destroy the Canadian economy. I am dubious, not the least of which is that if you paid any attention to the discourse around the American kidnapping of the Venezuelan president, that the state of the oil industry in that country is so dire that it would take a decade of sustained investment to bring them back up to an export capacity that would threaten us, and no major oil company wants to invest because of their past investments being expropriated. So, I’m really not sure that Smith’s scenario is all that credible. I’m not saying there wouldn’t be retaliation, because you can bet there would be, but her scenario comes off as abject nonsense (while she continues to counsel capitulation). Smith also rejected the calls to cancel her referendums because of the trade war, like the Parti Québécois leader promised to hold off on. Smith claimed it’s because she’s following her “citizenship initiation” law, but she gamed those rules to ensure there would be a referendum, so this is her putting her own party problems above the nation, once again.
My Latest:
Ukraine Dispatch:
There was a renewed attack on Kyiv early this morning. Ousted defence minister Mykhailo Fedorov says that Ukraine has a window of a few months to make needed changes, or risk losing the war.
Noteworthy:
- Police chiefs are dropping the pretence, and are flat-out saying they want the Lawful Access bill to be able to circumvent encryption. (This is VERY, VERY BAD!)
- Canadian and allied firms are still importing low-enriched uranium from Russia, in spite of years of sanctions, and haven’t invested in alternatives.
- Supriya Dwivedi looks to precedents abroad and suggests that the federal government make changes to their online harms legislation before the courts do.
- Paul Wells puts the demise of trade talks in the context of the fascism of Trumpism, and the need to “fall in line” and believe the lies to prove loyalty, which we refused.
Talking about Trump's trade war with Canada for the first part of this conversation. @anneapplebaum.wsocial.eu gets it.
— Dale Smith (@journodale.bsky.social) 2026-08-26T23:37:18.454Z
Want more Routine Proceedings? Become a patron and get exclusive new content.
I guess I don’t know what Fortress America means. Jennifer Robson made a good point, they should define it.