Remember the issue with self-employed Canadians applying for CERB, and being told they were eligible for gross income only to later be told that no, it was really net, and they may have to repay it? And then the government came to the realization that they were going to find themselves in serious trouble (such as a class action lawsuit) if they didn’t change course, and let those CERB payments go ahead? Well, for the people who made repayments, they can get that money back – but they have to apply for it. And that becomes the real trick.
With that in mind, here is Jennifer Robson raising some concerns with the whole thing, because CRA is not doing this very well. And that could be a problem for some of the people this is supposed to have been helping in the first place.
It is the right thing to do for gov’t to pay benefits to Canadians who applied in good faith with very limited or bad official information. It was a confusing time. I remember trying to keep track of programs in a little Google doc It was madness.
— Dr. J Robson (@JenniferRobson8) May 27, 2021
I realize that the CRA may not have enough info to verify that a CERB recipient-repayor met all THE OTHER eligibility rules (after the net/gross snafu), but no one who got CERB had to or could show proof of those criteria – it was an attestation.
— Dr. J Robson (@JenniferRobson8) May 27, 2021
and won’t get the money back. But similar people who didn’t repay will have kept the money. What message will this send?
— Dr. J Robson (@JenniferRobson8) May 27, 2021