Alberta premier Danielle Smith has decided to crank up grievance politics up to eleven, and has tabled a bill that would bar the federal government from entering into funding agreements with municipalities, but would require them to only do so with the province. This is similar to Quebec, but because this is Danielle Smith, her proposal goes much further and would include things like organizations or even post-secondary institutions getting research funding, because she’s concerned that they’re funding “ideological” projects, apparently not understanding how arm’s-length granting bodies operate. (There’s a good primer here).
https://twitter.com/LindsayTedds/status/1778184559718506741
Aside from this being based on some false premises, Smith is being utterly dishonest about the effect this will have. It’s not going to make things easier, or a “one-stop-shop,” as she claims—as it stands, intergovernmental negotiations is incredibly complex, and she is just giving her bureaucrats even more work. (See Jared Wesley’s thread below about just what these negotiations entail—it’s a lot).
I don't think many appreciate the amount of resources required to negotiate intergovernmental agreements like the ones contemplated by this new law.
With a misspent youth in IGR, let me walk you through what's involved in "approving" these sorts of agreements. + https://t.co/avQVD0RQ7A
— Jared Wesley (@DrJaredWesley) April 10, 2024
It’s also just virtue-signalling to her reactionary base, which likes to console itself with fairy tales of mean old Ottawa punishing Alberta because the province is just too great that everyone else is jealous, so they need to fight back and this is Smith “fighting back.” How much of this will survive implementation remains to be seen, but in the meantime, this is just more attempts to govern by vibes rather than reality, and it’s absolutely going to make things worse in the province, but they’re going to pretend once again that they’re being saviours, because of course they are.
Ukraine Dispatch:
A Russian attack on the village of Lyptsi near the border hit a grocery store, killing a 14-year-old girl. Russian air strikes also damaged a power plant near Odesa. Ukraine’s parliament is debating a bill to let prisoners join the army to become eligible for parole.
UPD. April, 10, 2024.
In the village of Lyptsi in #Kharkiv Oblast, three civilian people died as a result of the #Russian attack.#Russia killed a 14-year-old teenage girl, and two women at the age of 43 and 59.
Two more people were wounded.Source: Oleh Syniehubov pic.twitter.com/onW7fAfUx1
— UkraineWorld (@ukraine_world) April 10, 2024
⚡️ISW: Thin air defenses may permit more Russian attacks on rear Ukrainian cities.
The need to redistribute Ukraine's air defense systems to protect heavily targeted cities such as Kharkiv may lead to routine Russian attacks on rear logistics and cities.https://t.co/TfJtrtV1BI
— The Kyiv Independent (@KyivIndependent) April 11, 2024