NDP foreign affairs critic Heather McPherson tweeted her outrage at the US/UK air strikes against the Houthis yesterday, and Canada’s participation therein (solely in a planning capacity and not contributing any assets), but in her outrage, she decried that Parliament was not consulted before Canadian participation.
This is wrong. Parliament shouldn’t be consulted because it’s not Parliament’s decision.
Parliament doesn’t need to be consulted about military action. It’s a Crown prerogative, and for good reason, because Parliament holds the government to account for those actions. If Parliament is consulted and votes on it, it launders the accountability. https://t.co/JPaVxAQtlx
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) January 12, 2024
This kind of decision is a Crown prerogative, and that’s actually a good thing for accountability, because that is the role that the House of Commons should be playing on these decisions—holding the government to account. That’s the whole point of Parliament. MPs don’t govern—they hold to account those who do. And it’s important that we don’t have MPs voting on these kinds of decisions because that launders the accountability. In other words, if the House of Commons votes on military actions, then if things go wrong, they can’t hold the government to account for them because the government can turn around and say “You voted for this, it’s your responsibility, not ours.” That’s how our Parliament is structured, and why it works the way it does.
Oh, but you’ll say. There have been votes in the past! There have been, and they have largely been done for crass political calculations, particularly to divide opposition parties. Case in point was the extension of the Afghanistan mission, which Stephen Harper put to a vote specifically for the purpose of dividing the Liberals in opposition. It’s not how things are supposed to work. The government may announce a deployment or a mission in the House of Commons, and there might be a take-note debate on it, but there shouldn’t be a vote. If the opposition tries to force on as part of a Supply Day motion, as is their right, then it’s non-binding and is explicitly a political ploy, which makes it more transparent than a government’s attempt to launder accountability. And in this particular case, the fact that two or three Canadians are assisting in planning is hardly something that requires debate in the Commons.
Ukraine Dispatch:
Ukraine’s ground forces commander says they need more aircraft to make a difference in pushing back Russian forces. UK prime minister Rishi Sunak was in Kyiv to announce a new tranche of aid, and to address Ukraine’s parliament. A Ukrainian presidential aide says that the amended mobilization bill is expected to pass within days.
Rishi Sunak saw the consequences of Russia's terrorist attack on a high-rise building in Kyiv, – Minister of Internal Affairs Ihor Klymenko.
More than 700 people lived in this building. As a result of the occupiers' missile strike, 4 people were killed, 50 were injured, and… pic.twitter.com/NWKedpZIaG
— UkraineWorld (@ukraine_world) January 12, 2024
https://twitter.com/thestudyofwar/status/1745622690759606541